Punishment

Published on: December 27, 2009

Ten Ideas to Decrease Los Angeles DUI Arrests and Improve Highway Safety in 2010

1. Battle Los Angeles DUI incidences by improving the efficacy of rehab programs.

Sadly, rehab programs such as certain 12-step programs can be surprisingly ineffective at helping addicts recover from alcoholism. While only a few scientific surveys of groups like AA have been conducted, the results have not been particularly compelling. Indeed, some studies have suggested that 12-step treatment is no more effective than placebo treatment. Conversely, other rehab programs have demonstrated a statistically significant success rate, and perhaps there could be something to be learned from these more successful programs that could be more broadly applied and used to decrease the problem of Los Angeles DUI.

2. Increase prohibition on the use of cell phones and text messaging while driving.

As we’ve discussed elsewhere on this blog, the problem of driving while texting and driving while talking on the cell phone may be as big as — if not bigger than — the problem of driving under the influence in Long Beach and elsewhere in the Southland. Although California has made driving while texting illegal, perhaps more attention needs to be focused on this area. If we can reduce general driver distraction, we can likely reduce accidents and injuries on our roads.

3. Improve traffic engineering.

Road construction, bad or ineffective lighting, unclear signage, and other traffic engineering factors likely contribute to a significant percentage of accidents on Southern California roads. More innovative attention to these engineering problems can likely decrease the number of highway crashes significantly.

4. Use “crowd-sourcing” to identify dangerous drivers.

Crowd-sourcing is using aggregated community resources to get things done. Individuals armed with cameras and cell phones can in some circumstances help identify bad drivers and thereby exert social pressure to get them to conform to the laws of the state.

5. An improving economy can lead to more prosperity and more goodwill on the roads.

A depressed economy leads to depressed and distracted drivers. If you’re fatigued, in a bad mood, and stressed about finances, chances are you’re going to be a less attentive driver. Thus, in a bad economy, chances are that collectively Californians will be more at risk for getting into accidents — DUI and otherwise. If the economy improves, however, this may likely have a salutary effect on our collective driving behavior.

6. Campaign to raise the awareness of the danger of sleeplessness.

Driver fatigue is a significant contributor to accidents. Unfortunately, most people are not aware of how dangerous it can be to drive while sleepy, stressed, or otherwise out of sorts. A simple statewide educational campaign to explain these dangers could result in safer roadways.

7. Improve road maintenance.

Clearing debris out of lanes on highways and performing other general upkeep should likewise have a salutary effect on road safety.

8. Sell fewer red cars.

Studies show that the color red can inspire aggression in the minds of other drivers. Theoretically, if fewer red cars populated Southern California’s highways and byways, we might see a decrease in driver aggression and thus in accidents and injuries.

9. Improve education for minors about the ABCs of road safety.

Many new Southern California drivers do not understand or appreciate their responsibilities. Likewise, they may not understand the laws regarding DUI — in Southern California, for instance, if you’re under 21 years of age and you are caught with a blood alcohol concentration of just 0.01 percent — the equivalent of just a few sips of alcohol for some people — you can be arrested and charged with DUI in Southern California.

10. Provide better legal assistance.

Do you need fast, effective, and professional help with a charge of Los Angeles DUI?

Published on: December 21, 2009

Ten Concerns Regarding Los Angeles DUI and Other Driving Hazards in 2010

by Michael Kraut

1. Driving under the influence in Los Angeles will not be the only major challenge facing law enforcement agents in 2010 — driving while texting/phoning is also a huge issue.

A cell-phone-talking/texting epidemic has overrun Southern California. As more and more people become dependent on mobile devices to get through their lives, more and more drivers become inattentive. Left unchecked, this epidemic of distraction will surely lead to an increase in the number of injury accidents and deaths on our roads and freeways.

2. An increase in media distractions.

We face dangers not just from drivers who text but also from distractions such as flashing billboards (e.g. on Sunset Boulevard), billboards that change as we drive past them (e.g. on Pico Boulevard just west of Beverly Drive), and other intrusive forms of media, such as satellite radio. All these drags on our attention could ultimately lead to an increase in accident injuries.

3. General degradation of California’s highway and surface street infrastructure.

The California budget crisis has made it difficult for the state to spend necessary money on roadside repairs and upgrades to infrastructure. A dearth of road improvements will almost definitely translate into greater dangers for drivers.

4. The increase in diabetes and obesity in our population poses an indirect hazard to drivers.

As the obesity/diabetes epidemic spreads, more and more sick, inflexible, and medicated drivers are getting on our roads, and this likely poses a serious public safety challenge.

5. Failure of rehabilitation programs.

Recidivist alcoholics are at higher risk for DUI. Unless and until we find a more effective and less costly way to curb alcoholism and addiction in our population, we will face a greater risk — not only of Southern California DUI injury accidents — but also of other safety problems.

6. Problems educating underage drivers.

Today’s youth are bombarded with distractions that did not exist even a decade ago — such as social networking, twittering, and other relentlessly aggressive technologies. These youth may be so distracted by these toys that they fail to attend to basic driving skills effectively.

7. Collective habituation to the dangers of DUI in Pasadena and elsewhere in Southern California.

Although driving under the influence in Southern California remains a serious problem, it is a well-known problem. Thus, we don’t hear about the dangers every day, and this lack of awareness likely contributes to increased risk.

8. Better technology can lead to overconfidence.

With GPS systems and other technological gizmos available to many Southern California drivers, overconfidence can easily result. Put too much trust in any automated system — and relinquish too much control over your automobile — and road mishaps are almost certainly bound to follow.

9. Better safety technology can lead to an increase in risk tolerance.

The advent of antilock brakes was supposed to slash accident rates across the country. It didn’t — at least not to the extent that it should have. One theory for why is that drivers who have ABS tend to wait until later to brake — due to their confidence in safety features. Thus, even though a car built today might objectively safer than a car built in, for instance, in 1985, our collective reliance on “last minute” safety features might ultimately wash out the difference.

10. Failure to get good legal help for charges of Los Angeles DUI…

Published on: December 18, 2009

9 Eye-Popping Numbers regarding Southern California DUI in 2009

by Michael Kraut

As 2009 wraps up, it’s time to turn our attention to Southern California DUI statistics that engaged our attention and reminded us about the dangers and costs of violating California Vehicle Code Sections 23152(a) and 23152(b).

Here are 9 eye-popping numbers:

1. 28,457 – the number of people hurt in accidents in CA in 2008, in which alcohol played a key role, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

2. 1,029 – the number of people killed in “alcohol impaired motor vehicle fatalities” in CA in 2008. The only state with more alcohol auto fatalities in 2008 was Texas (1,269).

3. 214,811 – the number of DUI arrests made in 2008, according to the CHP.

4. 45 – the number of fatalities that occur every day on US roads during the Christmas season. 36 fatalities per day occur on average. 54 on average die on New Year’s Eve — 40 percent of these fatalities involve alcohol in some capacity.

5. 2,500 — The number of 2010 sobriety checkpoints that will be funded by the California Office of Traffic Safety.

6. 4/100,000 — According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration FARS survey, this is the rate of alcohol-related driving fatalities per population nationally.

7. (way more than) 18 — the number of celebrity Beverly Hills DUI arrests in 2009. For more on the celeb Los Angeles DUI arrests from January through June 2009, see our blog post from 12/16. For more on the July through December DUI arrests, see our blog post from 12/21.

8. 15-20 — According to the NHTSA publication “Young Drivers” (2009), motor vehicle accidents are the number one cause of death for young adults age fifteen to twenty.

9. 380 — according an NHTSA pamphlet called “alcohol impaired driving” (2008), drivers who operate vehicles with BACs of 0.15 percent or greater (it is illegal in California to drive with a BAC of 0.08%) are 380 times more likely to get into Los Angeles DUI crashes that result in death than are sober drivers.

To get effective and reliable help with your DUI charge — whether it’s a minor misdemeanor Southern California DUI or a serious injury charge — connect with a reliable lawyer today.

Published on: December 4, 2009

When is the safest time to drive? When is the most dangerous time to drive? And how can you avoid encountering drivers who are driving under the influence in Los Angeles?

by Michael Kraut

When most people talk about solutions to the problem of driving under the influence in Southern California, they discuss prosecution and penalties. However, as the adage goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. It’s a plausible hypothesis that, if we can collectively improve and manage driver behavior, we could dramatically slash accident rates and road fatalities far more effectively than we do now with our system that is heavy on “sticks” and light on “carrots.”

With that theory in mind, let’s examine some numbers put out by organizations like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, AAA, and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety to determine the most dangerous (and safest) times and circumstances for driving.

Before we delve into the numbers, understand that accident statistics can often mislead. For instance, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reported that, in 2007, more than 14,000 people died during the afternoon rush hour (from 5 PM to 7 PM). If you only heard that statistic — and took it out of context — you might be wary of driving at all during rush hour. However, it turns out that rush hour is relatively safe — at least compared with the hours of midnight to 3 AM. Although the number of fatalities during the early morning hours is lower, the percentage of accidents that occur during this time is much higher. This is because, during the wee hours of the morning, the roads empty out, leaving a much higher percentage of drivers who are DUI, tired, distracted, and so forth.

NHTSA statistics show that the midnight-to-3 AM shift is 10 times more deadly then is the 6 AM to 6 PM shift. Your risk increases even more if you drive between midnight and 3 AM on Saturday and Sunday mornings — when many people leave bars, clubs, and parties with higher than normal blood alcohol levels.

Statistics also belie some of our other intuitions. January and February are safer months than August and October, for instance — even though January and February are winter months and thus have worse weather. School buses — which do not have seat belts — appear to be safer than automobiles and trucks, which DO have seatbelts. Driving a motorcycle is far more dangerous than most people realize. Wednesday is the safest day to drive, while Sunday mornings are the most dangerous. Young male drivers between the ages of 16 and 24 are around four times as likely to die in automobile crashes than average. The day after a snowfall is particularly hazardous, according to research from the University of California Berkeley, which found that fatality rates spike by 14% on the day after a big snowstorm.

To sum up, an array of factors contributes to driving danger/safety, including:

* time of day (day or night)
* weather conditions
* driver distractibility (cell phones, texting and radio in the car)
* fatigue
* locality (city, suburb, country – e.g. Burbank may have different danger-times and zones than Long Beach)
* vehicle upkeep
* road upkeep
* macroscopic social trends, particularly trends that reflect on your age/demographic group
* whether or not you or another driver consumed certain foods, alcohol, narcotics, or medications
* your level of stress
* so on and so forth
With all these factors at play, if you’re arrested for DUI with injury in Southern California, you may need an agile and astute attorney to develop a battle plan. The California Vehicle Code Sections 23152(a) and 23152(b) stipulate severe punishments for drivers who hurt other people while operating a motor vehicle with a BAC level of 0.08% or more. Punishments can depend on factors like how many people you hurt, how seriously you hurt them, whether you violated any traffic laws, and whether or not another party or parties could be partially responsible for the accident.

For help distilling a plausible and strategic approach to your defense, connect with Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Criminal & DUI Lawyers ASAP. As a Harvard Law School educated former LA Deputy District Attorney, Attorney Kraut has the experience, street smarts and intellect to build an aggressive defense for you.

Published on: November 10, 2009

David Letterman Is Informed That The White Collar Fraud Was Not What Halderman Intended When He Demanded Money To Keep His Mouth Hush

by Michael Kraut

Prosecutors and top rated defense attorneys faced off in court today over the allegations of sex, lies and screenplays in the David Letterman extortion case. Extortion is a serious crime. A person convicted of this offense will most likely be sent to state prison for many many years. Extortion is defined as the use of either threat of violence or some other criminal means to cause any harm, including financial, to another person or their reputation, to obtain property from someone else with their consent.

In this case, Halderman is accused of threatening to divulge personal information about Letterman that could cause harm to the entertainer’s reputation.

The case revolves around Halderman, a well known TV producer,whose wife had a long running affair with Mr. Letterman. Halderman is the accused extortionist who wrote a screenplay about Letterman’s sex life with female staffers. The case stems from Halderman, who was angry over his wife’s affair could not find any way to make his wife stop the relationship with the late night comic. Records indicate that he continually confronted his wife about ceasing the affair. She apparently apologized and committed to her relationship with Halderman. Things seemed to be mending between the couple until he found that she had not stopped the affair.

Halderman decided to take his revenge out on the keyboard. Penning a script about Letterman’s hostile work environment. Then on September 9, 2009, Halderman delivered a portion of the script, which contained changed names, to Letterman’s driver, with documents which corroborated Halderman’s facts in the script. He then gave Letterman an opportunity to buy the script rather then see it made into a movie. Halderman met two times with Letterman’s lawyers and in taped conversations in which he was recorded demanding money. Afterward, a check for $2 million was given to Halderman.

Halderman’s criminal defense attorney indicated that their client was merely selling a screenplay and by filing the charges, the prosecutors were infringing on his First Amendment right of free speech.

Published on: November 7, 2009

California Legislators Begin to Call for DUI Convictions To Fall Under Three Strikes Laws

by Michael Kraut

California laws appear to be getting more harsh for those charged with Southern California DUIs. Legislators in recent months have begun to amass together to bring sweeping changes to the existing DUI laws. As of today, the laws are fairly straight forward. Los Angeles DUI defense Attorneys who are former prosecutors, and have trained law enforcement officers, are well versed in the penalties in DUI cases. The DUI defense attorney who who almost exclusively handle DUI cases are often in the best position to ensure that these penalties do not fall on their clients’ shoulders. Those charged and convicted with a first time Los Angeles DUI can expect the following to occur:

1. Driver’s License suspended for 4 months.
2. Must enroll in a 3 month DUI alcohol awareness program.
3. Pay huge court fines.
4. Receive a criminal record.
5. Be placed on probation for a period of at least two years.
6. Have a public record of conviction.
7. Mandatory jail sentence.
8. Sky rocketing insurance rates.

Because these penalties are so sever, it is always recommended that if a person is stopped and arrested for a Los Angeles DUI, that they immediately hire a pre-filing DUI defense attorney. Often times the criminal defense attorney is able to raise legal questions so that charges are either reduced or in some cases fully dismissed.

Those charged with a second time DUI have significantly higher penalties. A second time DUI is determined by a person having been convicted of a DUI sometime within the last 10 years before the most recent DUI. The penalties include the following:

1. Mandatory jail sentence of between 4 and 10 days and a maximum of 6 months in county jail.
2. Dui alcohol school that lasts 18 months at a minimum or a maximum of 30 months.
3. Driver’s license suspended for 2 years.
4. Court can mandate formal probation.
5. Court may order a DUI interlock device. This device will need to be blown into before your car can start. While this may not seem that inappropriate, if your job requires you to drive at all, you may likely be fired.
6. Huge fines from the court.
7. Loss of car insurance or significantly increased fines.

While these penalties are sever, Sacramento legislators are considering apply the Three Strikes Law to driving under the influence cases, making the penalties even harsher. The law makers are publicly upset about cases in which people have been convicted of eight or nine separate DUIs are still able to get back behind the wheel after their sentence is complete.

The most recent statistics from the California Department of Motor Vehicles indicate that almost 1,500 people were killed in DUI related deaths in 2007. In addition to those killed, well over 30,000 people were injured in DUI accidents during the same time period.

Statistics from 2006 point to an alarming increase in the rise of Los Angeles DUIs, as well as driving under the influence cases throughout Southern California and the rest of the State. The State reports in excess of 5,000 drivers had amassed four DUI conviction within the last 10 years.

Based upon these statistics, law makes are talking about instituting a Three Strikes type law which would permanently take these repeat offenders off the roadways. Tougher DUI laws are already being enacted. Beginning next year, first time DUI offenders In Los Angeles who are convicted of either Driving under the Influence of Alcohol or drugs in violation of CVC 23152(a) or of having a blood alcohol level in excess of of .08% in violation of CVC 23152(b), will have to have a ignition interlock device installed on any vehicle they drive.

Published on: October 7, 2009

Mel Gibson’s Los Angeles DUI Arrest Expunged

by Michael Kraut

Most people remember Mel Gibson’s 2006 ranting anti-semitic remarks during his Los Angeles DUI arrest. After pleading guilty early in the proceedings, he was convicted of driving under the influence. Since that time. Mr. Gibson plead guilty, paid all of fines, and successfully completing his Los Angeles DUI education course.

Recently, his Los Angeles DUI defense attorney filed a motion to expunge his criminal record. The law allows a person to file a complicated motion to remove their criminal record once they have successfully completed all of the terms of probation.

A California expungement actually creates a situation in which the previous guilty judgment that resulted in a criminal record, is withdrawn, and the case is dismissed.

California allows expungements in cases in which a person was not sentenced to prison or given a suspended prison sentence. If all the terms of probation are completed in a successful manner, then a Los Angeles expungement attorney can file and argue the motion.

If the court grants the motion then the person can honestly say that they have not been convicted of a crime. However, there are some consequences that remain even though the person’s record is cleaned. The conviction will still be used as a prior if the person is convicted of another offense. In terms of Mel Gibson, while his conviction was withdrawn and the case was dismissed, if he is charged with another Los Angeles DUI within 10 years, then the previous conviction will be used to enhance his punishment.

Published on: September 2, 2009

Warrant Issued For the Arrest of Bobby Brown…Is He in Los Angeles?

by Michael Kraut

Celebrity singer and husband to Whitney Houston is wanted for a warrant issued by a judge. Some people think that he is hiding in Los Angeles, California. A Massachusetts judge issued a warrant for the arrest of Bobby Brown after he failed to pay child support. Brown was previously ordered to pay $45,000 in child support to the two teenager children he has from a previous relationship with his former girlfriend, Kim Ward.

bobby%20brown.jpg

The law surrounding warrants in Massachusetts is almost identical to a Los Angeles bench warrant. There are two different ways in which a bench warrant can be issued for the arrest of a person. The first is if a person is wanted for a crime. The judge will issue an arrest warrant. Once that is issued then law enforcement will arrest you and take you into custody. The second way a warrant can be issued is if you were supposed to be in court, or were ordered to do something by a judge and you failed to perform satisfactorily.

A warrant should be cleared as soon as you become aware of one being issued. Otherwise, you might not be able to get the best result on a case. In Los Angeles, a warrant while on probation could harm your chances to have your case expunged after you have completed a grant of probation.

A Los Angeles bench warrant attorney is be able to assist you in getting the warrant recalled and quashed as well as able to help you get a Los Angeles expungement.

Published on: August 20, 2009

Los Angeles Dance Instructor for “Dancing With The Stars” Charged With Rape

by Michael Kraut

In April of this year the Los Angeles Police Department arrested Los Angeles sex crimes suspect and Choreographer Alex Da Silva. Da Silva, 41, who has been featured on “So You Think You Can Dance”. The previous arrest resulted in no charges by the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office. The DA’s Office determined that further investigation and evidence was required. In the mean time, Da Silva hired a top notch Los Angeles criminal defense attorney.

da%20silva.jpg

After four months of dogged work, the LA District Attorney’s Office filed 8 major sex crime felonies against Da Silva. He was arrested at his North Hollywood home. At the time he was originally arrested, Da Silva took the strong and aggressive action of hiring a pre-filing Los Angeles criminal defense attorney to protect his interests. While the case could have been much worse had he not made this decision.

For many years the LAPD had been receiving complaints of sexual assaults by the choreographer. But no charges were ever filed. After numerous woman who did not know each other complained of the same type of activity the prosecution filed the rape charges.

Da Silva has now been re-arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting several of his dance students. The acts charged occurred during the time period of August 2002 and March of 2009. The charges include four counts of forcible rape, two counts of assault with intent to commit rape and two counts of sexual penetration by a foreign object. Da Silva faces decades in prison.

The famous dance instructor is being held on $6.2 million bail and he will be arraigned this Thursday in Van Nuys, California

Published on: August 14, 2009

California Supreme Court Now Allows Los Angeles DUI Defense Attorneys to Contest the Validity of a Breathalyzer

by Michael Kraut

The California Supreme Court has given the go ahead to Los Angeles DUI defense attorneys to question the reliability of breathalyzers used in Southern California DUI arrests. The case, California v. Neal, was decided by the justices. This new ruling now allows top notch Los Angeles criminal defense attorneys to question the actual reliability of this test. For too long the common breathalyzer has been seen to be pretty much infallible by courts. This new ruling will allow the jury to hear from experts presented by the defense which will raise doubts as to the validity of the test.

Upon arrest, most police agencies take the Los Angeles DUI suspect to a police station and require a sample of either blood or breath. Now, the breath test results can be aggressively attacked.

It is extremely important if you are arrested in Southern California for driving under the influence that you immediately hire a pre-filing DUI defense attorney. That attorney can bring facts to the attention of the prosecutor which may lessen the potential charges. After the Supreme Court’s decision, a Pasadena DUI which resulted from a breathalyzer test can be attacked by an attorney.